Using search engines effectively is now a key skill for researchers, but could more be done to equip young researchers with the tools they need. Here, Dr Neil Jacobs and Rachel Bruce from Jisc’s digital infrastructure team share their top ten resources for researchers from across the web.
Every click of the mouse, every search box, needs to work hard to make the best use of a researcher’s time.
For each gem of a resource that a researcher discovers, there may be a dozen abandoned web pages, armies of half-read abstracts and false leads. Knowing how, and where, to search for resources is vital for saving time and getting quickly to the results that matter.
One of the best ways to increase your hit-rate is by going beyond Google to a specific academic search engine or database.
Here, we outline the top search engines and resources that work hard for researchers to help them get the figures, answers and arguments they need.
What is it? A so-called ‘answer engine’, the service answers queries directly based on the search terms rather than providing a list of results.
Key features: Search for information about domain names and compare websites. It also has various maths and statistics functions.
Neil says:
“WolframAlpha is probably the most innovative of the answer engines. It attempts to answer free-text questions or provide information about things rather than supply a list of web sites tagged as connected with a subject.”
What is it? BASE is one of the world's most voluminous search engines especially for academic open access web resources from over 2,000 sources.
Key features: Allows you to search intellectually selected resources and their bibliographic data, including those from the so-called ‘deep web’, which are ignored by commercial search engines. There are several options for sorting the results list and you can browse by Dewey Decimal Classification and document type.
Neil explains:
“BASE is bigger than CORE, but the discovery tools are not as advanced.”
What is it? Many university libraries have one of these services working behind the scenes, they index a vast range of academic resources and provide sophisticated search tools.
Key features: The search includes journal articles, e-books, reviews, legal documents and more that are harvested from primary and secondary publishers, aggregators and open-access repositories.
Rachel comments:
“Many researchers might not even know their library has this tool – it just looks like the library catalogue to them – but is much more than that.”
What is it? One of the world’s most comprehensive research databases, this Jisc service gives you access to over 28,000 journals and more than 52 million article citations and conference papers through the British Library’s electronic table of contents.
Key features: Researchers can get email alerts of the table of contents in journals, keeping them up to date with the latest literature in their field.
Neil says:
“This is a very popular feature and is an easy way to search back to previous articles to support your research.”
What is it? This is a meta-catalogue of cultural heritage collections from a range of Europe's leading galleries, libraries, archives and museums. The catalogue includes books and manuscripts, photos and paintings, television and film, sculpture and crafts, diaries and maps, sheet music and recordings.
Features: You can download your resource, print it, use it, save it, share it and play with it.
Neil tells us:
“This is hugely important for the humanities and some social sciences.”
What is it? Harness the power of social discovery and particularly the #icanhazpdf hashtag for locating PDFs that you do not have access to through your institution.
Features: Tweet an article you need using this hashtag and someone will point you to a copy that you can access.
Source: http://www.compoundchem.com/2014/04/02/a-rough-guide-to-spotting-bad-science/ A Rough Guide to Spotting Bad Science Click to enlarge A brief detour from chemistry, branching out into science in general today. This graphic looks at the different factors that can contribute towards ‘bad’ science – it was inspired by the research I carried out for the recent aluminium chlorohydrate graphic , where many articles linked the compound to causing breast cancer, referencing scientific research which drew questionable conclusions from their results. The vast majority of people will get their science news from online news site articles, and rarely delve into the research that the article is based on. Personally, I think it’s therefore important that people are capable of spotting bad scientific methods, or realising when articles are being economical with the conclusions drawn from research, and that’s what this graphic aims to do. Note that this is not a comprehensive overview, no...
Source: https://liddylib.wordpress.com/tag/academic-social-networking/ academic social networking The Scholarly Communication Practices of Medical Sciences and Health Sciences users on Academia.edu: A guided research study As some of you may know, I recently completed my coursework for my MLIS degree (yay!) and am finally all set to graduate in October. What many of you may not know is that I chose to finish my degree by completing a guided research study instead of traditional coursework. Over the last 8 months, I have had the opportunity to explore one of my research interests: the scholarly communication patterns of users on academic social networking sites. The uptake of academic social networking sites is an interesting phenomenon. These platforms allow scholars to list their papers in a CV type fashion, to share their research, to name their research interests, and to look for others with sim...
Source: http://openscience.com/challenges-and-opportunities-for-open-assess-journals-in-asia/ Challenges and Opportunities for Open Assess Journals in Asia May 29, 2017 Asian universities increasingly implement open access mandates and repositories, in an effort to increase the accessibility of research results. A Blog Article by Pablo Markin. Over three-quarters of Taiwanese research institutions and universities have chosen to cease subscribing to Elsevier’s journal access packages, in their efforts to adopt open access as the format that sustainably enables local and international scholars to access publicly-funded scientific output. This is likely to be of more importance for the Asian scientific community than for its Western counterpart, as in the long term open access can level the global playing field in terms of research result accessibility by removing financial barriers to academic journal access. While this is contrary to the bus...
Comments
Post a Comment